psychogeek wrote:
Wishing wrote:
Cool, I was wondering that too actually, thanks!
That's why I asked here
the rules sections of game forums are great because you might have the same question as another person and everyone can benefit from the answer
I also feel that bringing up questions about the rules is also useful for RRG, because they get to see which parts of the rulebook that trip us up in terms of understanding. Asking questions like this is us providing a QA service.
The rules simply say "Roll your ATK instead of DEF against the attack. If you roll more net successes than the attacker, resolve those net successes as if you had made a successful attack."
I suspect that RidiQles is right, and the reaction is meant to make an attack-defense combo that both functions as a normal defense, only with ATK dice instead of DEF dice, and with the potential to damage or push the attacker. It could also be read as you saying that instead of defending, you are going to attack, and hope your attack connects, because you are giving up your defense for it. But I think that it would be spelled out more clearly if that was meant to be the case.